Unity vs Buildbox: A Comparative Analysis

In recent times, AppOnBoard has transitioned into a side business, with Buildbox taking center stage as the primary focus. This shift came about after the company acquired Buildbox in 2019 and subsequently made it available for free to developers. Founded by Zweig and Adam Piechowicz in 2016, AppOnBoard initially focused on creating playable ads for mobile games.

The acquisition of Buildbox has given AppOnBoard an opportunity to pivot and explore new possibilities. One of the notable advantages of Buildbox is its open-source nature, which allows developers to freely mix and remix APIs under licenses that enable collaboration and innovation. This collaborative approach sets Buildbox apart from other tools in the market.

Buildbox's AI-driven capabilities also enable it to generate assets that can be directly used in game development. According to Zweig, 'Inside Buildbox, you can just start to type and describe the game that you're building. We start to build the assets for you.' This approach aims to simplify game development and bring about a new era of creative freedom.

In contrast, Unity has also made significant strides in visual scripting with its VS (Bolt) feature. While Bolt offers a more intuitive way of creating games, some developers have reported issues with updates breaking compatibility between Unity and Bolt. This experience led one developer to abandon Unity/Bolt and shift focus to UE/Blueprints.

In conclusion, both Unity and Buildbox offer unique strengths and approaches to game development. Unity's VS (Bolt) feature provides a visual scripting solution that can simplify the development process, while Buildbox's AI-driven capabilities enable the creation of assets without extensive coding knowledge. Ultimately, the choice between these platforms depends on individual preferences and project requirements.

Unity vs buildbox